[He exhales, it's almost a sigh. Almost. And he doesn't answer what he deems Sam's rhetorical question.]
I say we shouldn't rule it out because I don't know what the security is like. [It's different on Concordia. In Gotham, he had all his resources, and the technology was familiar; he could be in and out without so much of a trace. And even if he was spotted, well, good luck trying to catch him before he could disappear into the night.
Here? Well, none of those things apply. That doesn't mean he isn't willing to look into it, if there's even a small chance of breaking in.]
But if there's a possibility of finding evidence, or it'll point us in an even clearer direction, then yes. We should.
no subject
I say we shouldn't rule it out because I don't know what the security is like. [It's different on Concordia. In Gotham, he had all his resources, and the technology was familiar; he could be in and out without so much of a trace. And even if he was spotted, well, good luck trying to catch him before he could disappear into the night.
Here? Well, none of those things apply. That doesn't mean he isn't willing to look into it, if there's even a small chance of breaking in.]
But if there's a possibility of finding evidence, or it'll point us in an even clearer direction, then yes. We should.