adamance: (shhhh sit down children)
lexa ([personal profile] adamance) wrote in [community profile] station722016-10-17 12:23 pm

[backdated to day 44: mental link]

[Withholding information had not been Lexa's goal, but she had wanted to thoroughly research what she could before she brought it to the rest of the Nest. For that reason, Lexa has been busy, but has been careful not to reveal what she has in hand until she's ready. Even as she prepares to speak to the Nest, she's not completely prepared, and there's a sense of agitation over this.

By now, she already knows the results of them following Ven, but they haven't yet received the information they require. Why they didn't take the opportunity is bothersome in and of itself, but there is little that she can change about that. It's about moving forward, and it's not as if she has the fullest degree of faith in the Nest. Nothing changes that.]


( Today, I'd like to speak to you all about the results of our meeting with Mind Life. The conversations we had prior to this meeting with the hacker group that privately contacted us may have been accurate on this front. ) [She deliberates revealing what she told them about their goals, but decides against it: Mind Life's desperation to remain stagnant and inactive is worrisome, to say the least.] ( They have their hearts in the right place, but not their minds. I'd say it's ironic given the name of their organization, but not surprising. They prefer passive communication over action. Their idealism may be worthwhile, but they have little help to offer because they refuse to make a show of any aggression.

As a result, our only boon from them is a list of people who they deem trustworthy. Or untrustworthy. Unsurprisingly, Saffit is on the list of unsavory individuals. She doubts that even the untrustworthy men could be behind the bombings, but we may come to see her perspective as one of denial given her unwillingness to act.

I've done the beginning search into many of the other individuals named, but I cannot be as thorough as any of our technical people. Trust that I will not be handing over this list lightly, and that the contents of it will not be available to everyone in the Nest. I would rather prevent any reactionary behavior as a result of what Sheena Frey chose to write down.
) [If anything, she refuses to share everything on the list with the Nest. She may give names, or an idea of whether or not someone is on the list, but she doesn't want any of the Hosts to set out on a crusade.

Especially when she can barely trust Sheena's judgment.]
exhuxperation: (Default)

[personal profile] exhuxperation 2016-10-18 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
( I understood what you said. You still made mention of keeping information to yourself in order to prevent reactionary results. Not only is this distrust in a higher degree, but the respect and command you've striven to create becomes meaningless. You've announced your intentions here, but now how can I or any of the others believe that you'll give us the whole story next time? I realize this may sound contradictory, but it would be as a result of your blatantly manipulative behavior.

In that vein, I would trust the rest of the brood with my life if this is the path you choose to take. While I do not agree with many of the people here, I respect their opinions and outlooks as any strategist worth their salt would. To directly liken it to a military body– we have small numbers and cannot afford to have anyone in the dark. The head must always be aware of the limbs and vice-versa.

Stepping closer to becoming part of something does not immediately equate losing oneself to it. Having been a commander, you should know this.
)
exhuxperation: (go on)

[personal profile] exhuxperation 2016-10-18 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
( This has less to do with morals and more to do with survival and success. Information is key, you know that. If something were so potentially intrinsic to a strategy, I would not have kept it from my troops. A lead is a lead. )

[ Yes, there have been facts that have been withheld in the past because it did not present a threat. It was on a need to know basis. But all else, he saw little reason to keep it from his officers. If they couldn't do their job efficiently due to his lack of given information, then he was the one to take the fall for it. ]

( If you believe this is some kind of motion to make reparations, you're less keen than I thought you to be, Commander. This is about organization and order– two things you know I've already spoken at length with you about. With disorder there is no success, especially when it's a small group.

Accusing me of actions spurred on by guilt is insulting to say the very least. The Nest doesn't have to like me and I don't have to like them, but we're going to have to work together as a cohesive unit.
)

[ Had Rey's denouncement stung? Of course. But he's here to work using logic and reason. Tools he's depended on in the past. ]

( Calling me foolish makes you out to be a fool as well. You seem to know so little of strategy if you're taking this course. This is basic, so allow me to spell it out tactically– we do not have large numbers. Possibly half of us come from a background pertaining to military function and the rest could be counted as civilian or even rogue. We're linked mentally and emotionally; on top of this, we all have specialized powers that only some are beginning to understand how to control.

Because of this particular group composition, there is no trimming of weak branches. We don't have that luxury. Everyone has to pull their weight. Everyone has to communicate, whether they like it or not. We are here, stuck with each other, whether we like it or not. So stop acting like you can keep people in the dark without consequence to yourself.
)
exhuxperation: (Default)

[personal profile] exhuxperation 2016-10-18 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
( Any leader, Lexa, would know that necessary loss is to be calculated at the beginning before any move. In this case, necessary loss should be low, but your claim of their risk puts that loss percentage higher.

Even if they don't take offense to being left out, I personally take offense to how ridiculous your so-called strategy is. If you've been met with wall and caution, maybe it's been in how you've interacted with them. A commander swallows the criticism and betters themselves from it. Everyone wants something; it would be your job to learn what it is to make it work.

More to the point: you cannot accurately predict how someone will react to anything. People are not mindless machines that act the same exact way every time. To think such a thing makes you seem stubborn and dim.

Speaking out may be a show of a strength, but it is only so when your reasons are not paper thin. Though admittedly, how lucky we are to see your true colors now rather than later when your abominable logic could put us in an unfortunate and easily avoided situation.
)
Edited (punctuation......) 2016-10-18 21:48 (UTC)
exhuxperation: (go on)

[personal profile] exhuxperation 2016-10-19 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
( You forget that before Rey even mentioned my history, I was already speaking about creating organization within the group. There was never any reluctance to talk about my past. It simply never came up. Don't put your aggravated feelings about that turn of events on my shoulders.

Withholding the information you have currently is not merely a list. Regardless of your particular call in saying it is unreliable, there is not enough to substantiate your argument. Neither you nor I can see the future and there is no way to know whether the contents and individuals will come to light and be useful in our mission. A simple point of strategy you overlooked– never rule things out completely. Being taken by surprise is embarrassing at least and deadly at worst.

Respect is earned. It can be broken and taken away easily. From your current failed judgments, I clearly put too much faith in your ability to reason.

I considered the context of your perspective and found the logic lacking. Please, stop assuming I don't look before I leap, it's an ugly way to argue.
)